<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Eclipse needs to switch to Swing before SWT really gets out of hand</title> <atom:link href="http://www.javarants.com/2004/04/06/eclipse-needs-to-switch-to-swing-before-swt-really-gets-out-of-hand/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.javarants.com/2004/04/06/eclipse-needs-to-switch-to-swing-before-swt-really-gets-out-of-hand/</link> <description>Rants about Java and other internet technologies by Sam Pullara</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:14:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator> <item><title>By: spullara</title><link>http://www.javarants.com/2004/04/06/eclipse-needs-to-switch-to-swing-before-swt-really-gets-out-of-hand/comment-page-1/#comment-1036</link> <dc:creator>spullara</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 22:27:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.javarants.com/?p=1066#comment-1036</guid> <description>Not really. I still think SWT is the biggest abomination ever.  BTW, you did read that this posting was from 2004, right?  Took them more than 5 years.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not really. I still think SWT is the biggest abomination ever.  BTW, you did read that this posting was from 2004, right?  Took them more than 5 years.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: haha</title><link>http://www.javarants.com/2004/04/06/eclipse-needs-to-switch-to-swing-before-swt-really-gets-out-of-hand/comment-page-1/#comment-1035</link> <dc:creator>haha</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 16:07:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.javarants.com/?p=1066#comment-1035</guid> <description>You must feel stupid now that they release 3.5 with a cocoa swt implementation right? :D</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You must feel stupid now that they release 3.5 with a cocoa swt implementation right? <img
src='http://www.javarants.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: spullara</title><link>http://www.javarants.com/2004/04/06/eclipse-needs-to-switch-to-swing-before-swt-really-gets-out-of-hand/comment-page-1/#comment-974</link> <dc:creator>spullara</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 15:27:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.javarants.com/?p=1066#comment-974</guid> <description>Not really. I still think SWT is the biggest abomination ever.  BTW, you did read that this posting was from 2004, right?  Took them more than 5 years.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not really. I still think SWT is the biggest abomination ever.  BTW, you did read that this posting was from 2004, right?  Took them more than 5 years.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: haha</title><link>http://www.javarants.com/2004/04/06/eclipse-needs-to-switch-to-swing-before-swt-really-gets-out-of-hand/comment-page-1/#comment-973</link> <dc:creator>haha</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 09:07:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.javarants.com/?p=1066#comment-973</guid> <description>You must feel stupid now that they release 3.5 with a cocoa swt implementation right? :D</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You must feel stupid now that they release 3.5 with a cocoa swt implementation right? <img
src='http://www.javarants.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
