<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: How Facebook could open the Open Graph APIs</title> <atom:link href="http://www.javarants.com/2010/05/12/how-facebook-could-open-the-open-graph-apis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.javarants.com/2010/05/12/how-facebook-could-open-the-open-graph-apis/</link> <description>Rants about Java and other internet technologies by Sam Pullara</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:14:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator> <item><title>By: Mike</title><link>http://www.javarants.com/2010/05/12/how-facebook-could-open-the-open-graph-apis/comment-page-1/#comment-1068</link> <dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 21:33:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.javarants.com/?p=1297#comment-1068</guid> <description>Love this idea Sam!  It will be interesting to see how how FB will respond in the next couple of days.  I also like the NYU/Diaspora thing but share the view elsewhere that at this point it&#039;s a bit overhyped :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love this idea Sam!  It will be interesting to see how how FB will respond in the next couple of days.  I also like the NYU/Diaspora thing but share the view elsewhere that at this point it&#39;s a bit overhyped <img
src='http://www.javarants.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: spullara</title><link>http://www.javarants.com/2010/05/12/how-facebook-could-open-the-open-graph-apis/comment-page-1/#comment-1066</link> <dc:creator>spullara</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 03:43:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.javarants.com/?p=1297#comment-1066</guid> <description>I actually agree. If 99% of the people still used Facebook to manage all their data that would be fine as an outcome.  The remaining 1% could be hosted on Diaspora and still get access to the other 99% of the users.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually agree. If 99% of the people still used Facebook to manage all their data that would be fine as an outcome.  The remaining 1% could be hosted on Diaspora and still get access to the other 99% of the users.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: GlennLEU</title><link>http://www.javarants.com/2010/05/12/how-facebook-could-open-the-open-graph-apis/comment-page-1/#comment-1065</link> <dc:creator>GlennLEU</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 03:39:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.javarants.com/?p=1297#comment-1065</guid> <description>To be perfectly frank, I don&#039;t think most real people understand these issues. Does a normal human understand what it means when you say that something should be stored on the server of your choosing and not on Facebook? I think not. I appreciate the Diaspora and other efforts, but think they need a strong centralized brand around them for it to make sense to people. Also, I think privacy in general is changing online, the emergence of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dirtyphonebook.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.dirtyphonebook.com&lt;/a&gt; and other similar sites is proof positive of that. Privacy is undergoing a redefinition as young folks are learning that sharing data online is normal. I don&#039;t see any real way around shifting these attitudes and changing this societal trend. It would certainly be nice if Facebook cared more about security though. The incident in the last week or so where people were able to check out private messages is more troubling to me than this other privacy stuff. Just my opinion.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be perfectly frank, I don&#39;t think most real people understand these issues. Does a normal human understand what it means when you say that something should be stored on the server of your choosing and not on Facebook? I think not. I appreciate the Diaspora and other efforts, but think they need a strong centralized brand around them for it to make sense to people. Also, I think privacy in general is changing online, the emergence of <a
href="http://www.dirtyphonebook.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.dirtyphonebook.com</a> and other similar sites is proof positive of that. Privacy is undergoing a redefinition as young folks are learning that sharing data online is normal. I don&#39;t see any real way around shifting these attitudes and changing this societal trend. It would certainly be nice if Facebook cared more about security though. The incident in the last week or so where people were able to check out private messages is more troubling to me than this other privacy stuff. Just my opinion.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: spullara</title><link>http://www.javarants.com/2010/05/12/how-facebook-could-open-the-open-graph-apis/comment-page-1/#comment-1063</link> <dc:creator>spullara</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 02:41:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.javarants.com/?p=1297#comment-1063</guid> <description>Now if we can only get Facebook to ask you what a user likes rather than their own database.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now if we can only get Facebook to ask you what a user likes rather than their own database.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sam Sethi</title><link>http://www.javarants.com/2010/05/12/how-facebook-could-open-the-open-graph-apis/comment-page-1/#comment-1062</link> <dc:creator>Sam Sethi</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 02:38:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.javarants.com/?p=1297#comment-1062</guid> <description>Glue has already implemented this by using the FB OpenGraph Protocol but the data objects &quot;liked&quot; are stored in their own servers and not in Facebook. Also I think Google are trying to do something similar with rel=me claims on my Google Profile.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glue has already implemented this by using the FB OpenGraph Protocol but the data objects &#8220;liked&#8221; are stored in their own servers and not in Facebook. Also I think Google are trying to do something similar with rel=me claims on my Google Profile.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
