ReplayTV and DVRs in general
Time shifting by keyword makes TV watchable, but
why are they failing?
Most recently the company that I got my DVR from
has gone chapter 11:SonicBlue
files chapter 11I haven't
heard what is going to happen to the ReplayTV service that provides me my
channel guide but I hope that it stays up until my ReplayTV unit dies. In any
case I am going to be in the market for a new DVR at some point. I really
cannot figure out why everyone doesn't have one of these things. They improve TV
to such an extent that it almost becomes a video-on-demand service with only the
normal cable charges.So now the
question becomes, "Can I put my faith in TiVo?". Who knows. What I do know is
that they have the only unit that I think is worth a damn and it doesn't work
with cable. So that means getting sattelite and a TiVo-enabled satellite tuner.
Unfortunately with that setup I do lose the ability to archive video which is
one of the reasons I bought a ReplayTV over TiVo in the first place. I could
always go with the non-satellite version but then I don't get the
dual-tuners.You might wonder why
people don't use their computers with a capture card to do this same thing. It
all revolves around the channel guide. Without the channel guide you can't
record by keyword and your whole system becomes a glorified VCR. The channel
guide and the search capabilities of the DVRs are really at the center of the
value proposition, recording digitally isn't. There are at least two open
source projects that I think have a chance at being
interesting:FreeVoMythTVBoth
of these projects use channel guide information from the same source, xmltv.
Now all I need is for someone to take the XML data and feed it to my ReplayTV
box when it needs to update.My wife
Lucy (the Korean secretary) on The West Wing captured from my ReplayTV (please
ignore the ridiculous speech by the
"president"): *removed to save
space*
Posted: Fri - March 21, 2003 at 10:04 AM
|